What can courts require if a contract is enforceable?

If a contract is deemed enforceable, courts can indeed require a party to perform its contractual obligations. This is based on the principle of "specific performance," which is a legal remedy that compels a party to fulfill their duties as outlined in the contract rather than merely providing monetary compensation for failure to perform. This requirement ensures that the terms of the contract are honored, reflecting the original intent of the parties involved.

The enforceability of a contract implies that it contains all necessary elements such as offer, acceptance, consideration, and lawful purpose. When these conditions are satisfied, and one party fails to perform, the other party can seek judicial intervention to compel performance. This approach upholds the integrity of contractual agreements, ensuring that individuals and businesses can rely on the commitments they make.

Other options, while they represent various aspects of contract law, do not directly pertain to what a court can mandate in cases of enforceable contracts. For instance, reviewing a contract for fairness might be part of the process in some disputes, but courts primarily focus on enforcing the terms as agreed. Similarly, modifying a contract generally requires mutual agreement from both parties and is not a unilateral enforcement action a court can take. Resolving disputes without further legal action could occur through mediation or arbitration